34 lines
725 B
Plaintext
34 lines
725 B
Plaintext
== Why is this an issue?
|
|
|
|
Explicitly specifying a ``++void++`` parameter list is required in C, but optional in {cpp}. Using ``++void++`` for a parameter-less function decreases its readability. The at-a-glance impression is that the function _does_ take a parameter, and it takes a second look to ascertain that it does not. Therefore the more compact notation is preferred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Noncompliant code example
|
|
|
|
[source,text]
|
|
----
|
|
int fun(void);
|
|
|
|
int fun(void) {
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Compliant solution
|
|
|
|
[source,text]
|
|
----
|
|
int fun();
|
|
|
|
int fun() {
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Resources
|
|
|
|
* https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/036324/CppCoreGuidelines.md#Rl-void[{cpp} Core Guidelines NL.25] - Don't use void as an argument type
|
|
|