63 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
63 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
== Why is this an issue?
|
|
|
|
Since the compiler will automatically invoke the base type's no-argument constructor, there's no need to specify its invocation explicitly. Also, when only a single ``++public++`` parameterless constructor is defined in a class, then that constructor can be removed because the compiler would generate it automatically. Similarly, empty ``++static++`` constructors and empty destructors are also wasted keystrokes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Noncompliant code example
|
|
|
|
[source,csharp]
|
|
----
|
|
class X
|
|
{
|
|
public X() { } // Noncompliant
|
|
static X() { } // Noncompliant
|
|
~X() { } // Noncompliant
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
class Y : X
|
|
{
|
|
public Y(int parameter) : base() // Noncompliant
|
|
{
|
|
/* does something with the parameter */
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Compliant solution
|
|
|
|
[source,csharp]
|
|
----
|
|
class X
|
|
{
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
class Y : X
|
|
{
|
|
public Y(int parameter)
|
|
{
|
|
/* does something with the parameter */
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Implementation Specification
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
include::message.adoc[]
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Comments And Links
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
|
|
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|