rspec/rules/S3043/java/rule.adoc

52 lines
950 B
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
Perhaps counter-intuitively, a ``++compareTo++`` method is _expected_ to throw a ``++NullPointerException++`` if passed a null argument, and a ``++ClassCastException++`` if the argument is of the wrong type. So there's no need to null-test or type-test the argument.
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,java]
----
public int compareTo(Object obj) {
if (obj == null) { // Noncompliant
return -1;
}
if (! obj instanceof MyClass.class) { // Noncompliant
return -1;
}
MyObject myObj = (MyObject) obj;
// ...
}
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,java]
----
public int compareTo(Object obj) {
MyObject myObj = (MyObject) obj;
// ...
}
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::message.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]