
When an include is not surrounded by empty lines, its content is inlined on the same line as the adjacent content. That can lead to broken tags and other display issues. This PR fixes all such includes and introduces a validation step that forbids introducing the same problem again.
42 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
42 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
== Why is this an issue?
|
|
|
|
``++switch++`` can contain a ``++default++`` clause for various reasons: to handle unexpected values, to show that all the cases were properly considered, etc.
|
|
|
|
For readability purposes, to help a developer quickly spot the default behavior of a ``++switch++`` statement, it is recommended to put the ``++default++`` clause at the end of the ``++switch++`` statement.
|
|
|
|
This rule raises an issue if the ``++default++`` clause is not the last one of the ``++switch++``'s cases.
|
|
|
|
[source,java]
|
|
----
|
|
switch (param) {
|
|
case 0:
|
|
doSomething();
|
|
break;
|
|
default: // Noncompliant: default clause should be the last one
|
|
error();
|
|
break;
|
|
case 1:
|
|
doSomethingElse();
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Implementation Specification
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
=== Message
|
|
|
|
Move this "default" clause to the end of this "switch" statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Comments And Links
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
|
|
|
|
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|