16f6c0aecf
Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once. Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information on what language the code is written in.
49 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
49 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
== Why is this an issue?
|
|
|
|
The ``++ISerializable++`` interface gives you control over _how_ your class is serialized, but does not itself make the class serializable. Such classes must also have the ``++[Serializable]++`` attribute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Noncompliant code example
|
|
|
|
[source,csharp]
|
|
----
|
|
public class Person : ISerializable { // Noncompliant; [Serializable] attribute missing
|
|
// ...
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Compliant solution
|
|
|
|
[source,csharp]
|
|
----
|
|
[Serializable]
|
|
public class Person : ISerializable {
|
|
// ...
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|
|
'''
|
|
== Comments And Links
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
=== on 4 Feb 2015, 14:17:17 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
Gendarme MissingSerializableAttributeOnISerializableTypeRule
|
|
|
|
=== on 13 Apr 2015, 10:47:40 Freddy Mallet wrote:
|
|
@Tamas, does this rule makes sense to you ? Thanks
|
|
|
|
=== on 22 May 2015, 09:23:53 Tamas Vajk wrote:
|
|
\[~freddy.mallet] Yes, it makes sense. BUT it is already implemented by the Roslyn team:
|
|
|
|
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms182350.aspx
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/blob/master/src/Diagnostics/FxCop/Core/Usage/SerializationRulesDiagnosticAnalyzer.cs
|
|
|
|
=== on 28 May 2015, 12:44:55 Tamas Vajk wrote:
|
|
This rule duplicates CA2237 (\https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms182350.aspx), which is already implemented by the Roslyn team.
|
|
|
|
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|