rspec/rules/S4488/java/rule.adoc
Fred Tingaud 16f6c0aecf
Inline adoc when include has no additional value (#1940)
Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once.

Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information
on what language the code is written in.
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00

62 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
Spring framework 4.3 introduced variants of the ``++@RequestMapping++`` annotation to better represent the semantics of the annotated methods. The use of ``++@GetMapping++``, ``++@PostMapping++``, ``++@PutMapping++``, ``++@PatchMapping++`` and ``++@DeleteMapping++`` should be preferred to the use of the raw ``++@RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.XYZ)++``.
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,java]
----
@RequestMapping(path = "/greeting", method = RequestMethod.GET) // Noncompliant
public Greeting greeting(@RequestParam(value = "name", defaultValue = "World") String name) {
...
}
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,java]
----
@GetMapping(path = "/greeting") // Compliant
public Greeting greeting(@RequestParam(value = "name", defaultValue = "World") String name) {
...
}
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
=== Message
Replace "@RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET)" with "@GetMapping"
Replace "@RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.POST)" with "@PostMapping"
Replace "@RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.PUT)" with "@PutMapping"
Replace "@RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.PATCH)" with "@PatchMapping"
Replace "@RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.DELETE)" with "@DeleteMapping"
=== Highlighting
Primary: "@RequestMapping"
Secondary: "RequestMethod.XZY"
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
=== on 2 Mar 2018, 13:54:49 Alexandre Gigleux wrote:
This rule should not raise an issue if the ``++method++`` parameter is not set. RSPEC-3752 is there to catch missing ``++method++``.
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]