rspec/rules/S1210/csharp/rule.adoc

72 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
When you implement ``++IComparable++`` or ``++IComparable<T>++`` on a class you should also override ``++Equals(object)++`` and overload the comparison operators (``++==++``, ``++!=++``, ``++<++``, ``++<=++``, ``++>++``, ``++>=++``). That's because the CLR cannot automatically call your ``++CompareTo++`` implementation from ``++Equals(object)++`` or from the base comparison operator implementations. Additionally, it is best practice to override ``++GetHashCode++`` along with ``++Equals++``.
This rule raises an issue when a class implements ``++IComparable++`` without also overriding ``++Equals(object)++`` and the comparison operators.
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,csharp]
----
public class Foo: IComparable // Noncompliant
{
public int CompareTo(object obj) { /* ... */ }
}
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,csharp]
----
public class Foo: IComparable
{
public int CompareTo(object obj) { /* ... */ }
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
var other = obj as Foo;
if (object.ReferenceEquals(other, null))
{
return false;
}
return this.CompareTo(other) == 0;
}
public int GetHashCode() { /* ... */ }
public static bool operator == (Foo left, Foo right)
{
if (object.ReferenceEquals(left, null))
{
return object.ReferenceEquals(right, null);
}
return left.Equals(right);
}
public static bool operator > (Foo left, Foo right)
{
return Compare(left, right) > 0;
}
public static bool operator < (Foo left, Foo right)
{
return Compare(left, right) < 0;
}
public static bool operator != (Foo left, Foo right)
{
return !(left == right);
}
}
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::message.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]