42 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
42 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
== Why is this an issue?
|
|
|
|
Looking at the set of methods and fields in a ``++class++`` and finding two that differ only by capitalization is confusing to users of the class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This situation may simply indicate poor naming. Method names should be action-oriented, and thus contain a verb, which is unlikely in the case where both a method and a field have the same name (with or without capitalization differences). However, renaming a public method could be disruptive to callers. Therefore renaming the member is the recommended action.
|
|
|
|
=== Noncompliant code example
|
|
|
|
[source,python]
|
|
----
|
|
class SomeClass:
|
|
lookUp = false
|
|
def lookup(): # Non-compliant; method name differs from field name only by capitalization
|
|
pass
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
=== Compliant solution
|
|
|
|
[source,python]
|
|
----
|
|
class SomeClass:
|
|
lookUp = false
|
|
def getLookUp():
|
|
pass
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Implementation Specification
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
include::../message.adoc[]
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Comments And Links
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
|
|
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|