rspec/rules/S2140/java/rule.adoc

42 lines
981 B
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
There is no need to multiply the output of ``++Random++``'s ``++nextDouble++`` method to get a random integer. Use the ``++nextInt++`` method instead.
This rule raises an issue when the return value of any of ``++Random++``'s methods that return a floating point value is converted to an integer.
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,java]
----
Random r = new Random();
int rand = (int)r.nextDouble() * 50; // Noncompliant way to get a pseudo-random value between 0 and 50
int rand2 = (int)r.nextFloat(); // Noncompliant; will always be 0;
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,java]
----
Random r = new Random();
int rand = r.nextInt(50); // returns pseudo-random value between 0 and 50
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::message.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]