rspec/rules/S2176/java/rule.adoc

41 lines
721 B
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
While it's perfectly legal to give a class the same simple name as a class in another package that it extends or interface it implements, it's confusing and could cause problems in the future.
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,java]
----
package my.mypackage;
public class Foo implements a.b.Foo { // Noncompliant
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,java]
----
package my.mypackage;
public class FooJr implements a.b.Foo {
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::message.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]