63 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
63 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
== Why is this an issue?
|
|
|
|
There's no point in having a test class without any test methods.This could lead a maintainer to assume a class is covered by tests even though it is not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supported test frameworks are ``++NUnit++`` and ``++MSTest++`` (not applicable to ``++xUnit++``).
|
|
|
|
This rule will raise an issue when any of these conditions are met:
|
|
|
|
* For *NUnit*, a class is marked with ``++TestFixture++`` but does not contain any method marked with ``++Test++``, ``++TestCase++``, ``++TestCaseSource++`` or ``++Theory++``.
|
|
* For *MSTest*, a class is marked with ``++TestClass++`` but does not contain any method marked with ``++TestMethod++`` or ``++DataTestMethod++``.
|
|
|
|
=== Noncompliant code example
|
|
|
|
[source,csharp]
|
|
----
|
|
[TestFixture]
|
|
public class SomeClassTest { } // Noncompliant - no test
|
|
|
|
[TestClass]
|
|
public class SomeOtherClassTest { } // Noncompliant - no test
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
=== Compliant solution
|
|
|
|
[source,csharp]
|
|
----
|
|
[TestFixture]
|
|
public class SomeClassTest
|
|
{
|
|
[Test]
|
|
public void SomeMethodShouldReturnTrue() { }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[TestClass]
|
|
public class SomeOtherClassTest
|
|
{
|
|
[TestMethod]
|
|
public void SomeMethodShouldReturnTrue() { }
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
=== Exceptions
|
|
|
|
* abstract classes
|
|
* derived classes that inherit from a base class that does have test methods
|
|
* in *MSTest*, classes that contain methods marked with either ``++AssemblyInitialize++`` or ``++AssemblyCleanup++``.
|
|
|
|
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Implementation Specification
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
include::../message.adoc[]
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Comments And Links
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
|
|
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|