rspec/rules/S2786/java/rule.adoc

58 lines
888 B
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
According to http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-8.html#jls-8.9[the Java Language Specification-8.9]:
____
Nested enum types are implicitly ``++static++``.
____
So there's no need to declare them ``++static++`` explicitly.
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,java]
----
public class Flower {
static enum Color { // Noncompliant; static is redundant here
RED, YELLOW, BLUE, ORANGE
}
// ...
}
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,java]
----
public class Flower {
enum Color { // Compliant
RED, YELLOW, BLUE, ORANGE
}
// ...
}
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::message.adoc[]
include::highlighting.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]