59 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
59 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
== Why is this an issue?
|
|
|
|
When the code under test in a unit test throws an exception, the test itself fails. Therefore, there is no need to surround the tested code with a ``++try++``-``++catch++`` structure to detect failure. Instead, you can simply move the exception type to the method signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This rule raises an issue when there is a fail assertion inside a ``++catch++`` block.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supported frameworks:
|
|
|
|
* JUnit3
|
|
* JUnit4
|
|
* JUnit5
|
|
* Fest assert
|
|
* AssertJ
|
|
|
|
=== Noncompliant code example
|
|
|
|
[source,java]
|
|
----
|
|
@Test
|
|
public void testMethod() {
|
|
try {
|
|
// Some code
|
|
} catch (MyException e) {
|
|
Assert.fail(e.getMessage()); // Noncompliant
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Compliant solution
|
|
|
|
[source,java]
|
|
----
|
|
@Test
|
|
public void testMethod() throws MyException {
|
|
// Some code
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Implementation Specification
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
include::message.adoc[]
|
|
|
|
include::highlighting.adoc[]
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Comments And Links
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
|
|
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|