rspec/rules/S4524/java/rule.adoc

55 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
``++switch++`` can contain a ``++default++`` clause for various reasons: to handle unexpected values, to show that all the cases were properly considered.
For readability purpose, to help a developer to quickly find the default behavior of a ``++switch++`` statement, it is recommended to put the ``++default++`` clause at the end of the ``++switch++`` statement. This rule raises an issue if the ``++default++`` clause is not the last one of the ``++switch++``'s cases.
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,java]
----
switch (param) {
case 0:
doSomething();
break;
default: // default clause should be the last one
error();
break;
case 1:
doSomethingElse();
break;
}
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,java]
----
switch (param) {
case 0:
doSomething();
break;
case 1:
doSomethingElse();
break;
default:
error();
break;
}
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::message.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]