27 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
27 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
=== on 11 Jul 2013, 16:28:39 Dinesh Bolkensteyn wrote:
|
|
I'm changing the severity to Critical as this is most likely a bug that will be caught at runtime.
|
|
|
|
=== on 11 Jul 2013, 17:18:18 Dinesh Bolkensteyn wrote:
|
|
Implemented by \https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONARJAVA-205
|
|
|
|
=== on 11 Jul 2013, 17:21:24 Dinesh Bolkensteyn wrote:
|
|
Fabrice, it looks like to me that this can also deprecate some Findbugs checks:
|
|
|
|
|
|
ES_COMPARING_STRINGS_WITH_EQ
|
|
|
|
ES_COMPARING_PARAMETER_STRING_WITH_EQ
|
|
|
|
|
|
I did not really get the difference between those 2 however
|
|
|
|
=== on 13 Apr 2015, 09:17:37 Dinesh Bolkensteyn wrote:
|
|
FYI, [~ann.campbell.2], this rule is not applicable to C# and VB.NET, where ``++==++`` works.
|
|
|
|
=== on 31 Oct 2018, 17:19:36 Tibor Blenessy wrote:
|
|
We are reopening this issue because it can be used as a bug activated by default in SonarWay, while RSPEC-1698 should remain a code smell.
|
|
|
|
=== on 31 Oct 2018, 17:36:38 Tibor Blenessy wrote:
|
|
In fact, it would be better to have a new rule, because we want to extend for boxed primitives (``++java.lang.Integer++``, etc...}}
|
|
|